The type of argumentation in the paper
2024-08-29 11:53:54 0 Report
Log in to view full content
This mind map explores the various types of argumentation utilized in academic papers, emphasizing their significance in enhancing the quality and persuasiveness of scholarly work. It categorizes argumentation into theoretical, empirical, inductive, deductive, comparative, causal, and metaphorical types, each with distinct characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages. The map highlights the importance of selecting appropriate argumentation methods based on the paper's focus, whether theoretical or empirical, to ensure logical rigor and evidence sufficiency. Additionally, it outlines strategies for building powerful arguments, maintaining coherence, and ensuring the clarity and accuracy of language to enhance readability.
Other works by the author
Outline/Content
The importance of argumentation types
Define the type of argumentation
Theoretical argumentation
Concept explanation
logical structure
empirical argumentation
Data collection
Statistical analysis
The impact of argumentation types on the quality of the paper
Enhance persuasiveness
logical rigor
Sufficiency of evidence
Enhance readability
structural clarity
Language accuracy
primary argument types
inductive argument
From the particular to the general reasoning
Case study method
Statistical analysis method
The advantages and disadvantages of inductive argumentation
Advantage: Intuitive and easy to understand
Disadvantage: it may overlook exceptions
deductive argument
From the general to the particular reasoning
Hypothesis-Deduction Method
Logical reasoning method
The advantages and disadvantages of deductive argumentation
Advantage: Logical rigor
Disadvantage: The underlying assumptions may not hold true
Comparative argumentation
Compare different viewpoints or methods
and contrast
Advantages and disadvantages comparison
Considerations for comparative argumentation
Ensure that the objects being compared are comparable.
Avoid bias and subjectivity.
causal argument
Explore the relationship between cause and effect.
Experimental design
causal chain analysis
The difficulty of causal argumentation
ascertain the uniqueness of causality
exclude other potential factors
Theoretical argumentation
Cite famous quotes, authoritative data, etc.
Quote famous sayings or classic works.
Reference formulas, theorems, laws
Quote proverbs, sayings, and idioms.
Refer to common sense
The advantages and disadvantages of theoretical argumentation
Advantages: Enhances the authority and credibility of the argument
Disadvantage: Inaccurate or outdated引用内容
Metaphorical argumentation
Demonstrate the argument by using an analogy.
Metaphorical depiction
Metaphorical reasoning
Metaphorical evaluation
Metaphorical argument: pros and cons
Advantages: Vivid and lively, easy to understand and accept
Disadvantage: The metaphor is not appropriate enough, leading to misunderstandings by the readers.
Argumentation skills and strategies
Build a powerful argument
Clearly state the argument content
The argument must be specific and clear.
The argument must be innovative.
Use appropriate arguments
Arguments must be authentic and reliable
The argument must be closely related to the thesis.
Adopt appropriate argumentation methods
Choose the argumentation method according to the type of paper.
Theoretical papers focus on deductive reasoning.
Empirical papers focus on inductive argumentation
Note the coherence and logic of the argumentation.
Ensure that the argumentation steps are orderly and coherent.
Maintain logical consistency throughout the argumentation process
0 Comments
Next Page
Recommended for you
See more
